I am ready to take a large leaping in theory. The last thing I wrote in here was the Bicameral Mind piece, so if you haven't read that, maybe you might desire to check up on that out and then come up back here.
The bicameral head supposed that at one point we had literally two minds, one more than than Negro spiritual and witting and one more 'daily task' orientated and robotic in nature. This meant that we as a race were not operating at a witting degree during most of our lives, but were mostly reactionary. The clip framework for this is around one to four thousand old age ago. About two thousand old age ago, (give or take a few centuries) we managed to interrupt from the bicameral brain, but lost the spiritualty of the other half. We gained consciousness at the cost of our connexion with our higher selves, but now the higher selves are finally starting to emerge or perhaps re-merge with us. This started decennaries or perhaps even a few centuries ago. It started getting more than seeable with thulium and the Beatles, I think, and continued to turn from there. Meditation assists link with the higher self, and we are now finding ways to link with the Negro spiritual one-half that was sacrificed.
In essence, we are (well some of us anyway) starting to re-integrate our encephalons and addition the ability to entree information that was hidden to us. This doesn't have got to be anything spooky or too far out to accept. Think about the amount of information you are exposed to on a day-to-day basis. Thousands, if not millions, of spots of information are around us. We don't pay attending to them. We process a few thousand pieces per day, and most of that is lost to you within a few days, nearly all is gone within a calendar month or two. I'm not talking about 'lost' as in it's totally gone, but more than that you just don't cognize where it is stored or how to entree it. It is deep interior your memory and you have got lost the retrieval path. (Have you ever been talking to an old friend, and they speak about a shared moment? The clip you were down at the shore (or at the store, or doing a chore...) at first you completely don't have got an recollection of that event, but then you suddenly remember. It goes clear; as if it only happened yesterday. That friend reconnected the way that was lost.) OK, back to the point.
Think about this for a moment. You had something you were working on sometime last month. Maybe at work, maybe at home, but something... can you remember something? (If you can't remember anything, your memories may be buried deeper than most people.) So say you were learning a new piece of software. You mastered the rudiments and learned a clump more tools. You then only utilize the software system sporadically. You retrieve the basics, and all the other spots are lost in the grey creases of your brain. You might be able to calculate something out by looking at the computing machine screen, but you may have got to relearn it. (The relearn travels much quicker since you already instinctively cognize the path.)
Now take this to a different level. You have got hereditary knowledge. You do! It have got been proven that we have certain traits that are genetic. I saw a show on the Discovery Channel on a brace of Gemini who had the exact mannerisms, even though they were raised apart. This is an illustration of the cognition I am talking about. The traits were inside, not taught. I, and many others, believe there is more than available to us. Whether you desire to see it as past life memories, cognition from another airplane of existence, or familial race memory, it really doesn't matter. In all these lawsuits it is memory that could assist us to go what we were born to be.
This is staggering. Take just the tip of the iceberg, if that is easier for the 'let's maintain a tight clasp on world here, Rob' people. If you could access all the information that you have got been exposed to in this life, how might that impact your determination devising process? Can you state 'better informed choice'? We have got got all forgotten most of what we have ever learned. Many of us still are barely above the twenty-four hours by twenty-four hours robotic being of our unconscious ancestors. First we entree this life's knowledge, then seek for the hereditary knowledge, then the interconnected cognition alkali of the human species, then maybe cognition from another airplane of existence.
If you can't come up to clasps with this, fall in the club. I believe we are at the beginning of a new form of human understanding, and there is going to be much opposition to this. Certainly major faiths are already speaking out against the new spirituality. Why? Bash they not desire people to be spiritual? I believe the job they see is that with interior spiritualty there will be no demand for the hierarchy of organized religion, and the manage of control is falling from their grasp. I believe on the less levels, individual pastors, imaums and priests, there is no issue with the new Negro Negro spiritual growth.
Julian Jaynes placed the beginnings of faith with the hallucinations of the 'spiritual half' of the bicameral mind. The schizophrenic ravings of holy work force were the footing of today's religions, according to Jaynes. He didn't accept that the messages could have got been coming from anywhere but the 'higher half' of the human mind. BUT what if they were? What if there was a connexion to another realm, and the bicameral split was natures manner of protecting us from going huffy from the voices in our heads. What if we needed to germinate mentally before those voices could be heard for what they were, and we could put a drape between kingdoms of our heads to protect us from mental head stew?
If the effusions from a turret's sick person could be compared to the ability to separate between world and 'revealed' head realms, then have got we evolved to the point where we can manage having dualism in our idea process? Can we maintain the kingdoms separate? I believe as a resource of cognition it would be great to have got entree to limitless information, but how make you maintain a portion of you as 'you' and how make you maintain from getting lost in the nimiety of data?
No comments:
Post a Comment